A selection of Administrative Law Judge decisions regarding The Practice of Barbering. The decisions are sorted in ascending chronological order.
PLEASE NOTE: All decisions are posted in PDF format. In order to view these documents, you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader installed on your machine. To learn how to download Adobe's Acrobat Reader, go to Acrobat PDF File Download Information.
Department of State, Division of Licensing Services v. Stanley Gongol
May 12, 1992 - (22KB PDF file) (6 pages)
The issue in the hearing was whether the applicant/respondent should be denied renewal of his license as a master barber and whether his existing license should be revoked because he had been convicted of a crime of moral turpitude.
Department of State, Division of Licensing Services v. Heriberto Lopez
106 DOS 94 - October 26, 1994 - (11KB PDF file) (2 pages)
The complaint alleges that the respondent operated a barber shop without a shop license and without conspicuously posting his barber license or the barber license of another person who was working in the shop.
Department of State, Division of Licensing Services v. Joseph Corulla
109 DOS 94 - November 3, 1994 - (10KB PDF file) (2 pages)
The complaint alleges that the respondent failed to post his barber's
license conspicuously in the shop in which he was engaged in the practice of
barbering.
Department of State, Division of Licensing Services v. Vern Flack and Terri Olcott
121 DOS 94 - November 9, 1994 - (14KB PDF file) (3 pages)
The complaints allege, with regards to Mr. Flack, that he permitted a person to engage in the practice of hairdressing and cosmetology in a rental area in Mr. Flack's barber shop without a rental area license; permitted Ms. Olcott to engage in the practice of barbering in that shop without her barber's license being posted; and permitted a third person to "operate" with expired hairdresser and rental area licenses. They also allege, with regards to Ms. Olcott, that she engaged in the practice of barbering without her barber's license being posted.
Department of State, Division of Licensing Services v. Carlo Oppedisano, Jr.
137 DOS 94 - November 14, 1994 - (13KB PDF file) (2 pages)
The complaint alleges that the respondent failed to affix his photograph to his license to operate a beauty parlor and to his barber's license, and that he failed to have his barber's license and the license of a hairdresser/cosmetologist who worked in his beauty parlor posted conspicuously.
Department of State, Division of Licensing Services v. Tatyana Kantorovich
61 DOS 95 - April 18, 1995 - (10KB PDF file) (2 pages)
The complaint alleges that the respondent failed to conspicuously post a license to engage in the practice of barbering in the barber shop in which she was cutting the hair of a customer.
In the matter of the Application of Andrew T. Oster
92 DOS 95 - July 11, 1995 - (25KB PDF file) (7 pages)
The issue before the tribunal is whether the applicant should be denied renewal of his license to engage in the practice of barbering because of his conviction of the crime sexual abuse, 2nd degree.
Department of State, Division of Licensing Services v. Julio Pomarico
90 DOS 97 - April 16, 1997 - (10KB PDF file) (2 pages)
The complaint alleges that the respondent operated an appearance
enhancement business using a barber shop license, and allowed two unlicensed
operators to work in the shop in violation of General Business Law (GBL)
§401.
Department of State, Division of Licensing Services v. Martin Uscamayta
215 DOS 97 - June 18, 1997 - (13KB PDF file) (3 pages)
The complaint in the matter alleges that the respondent provided appearance enhancement services in a barber shop, allowed two unlicensed persons to perform appearance enhancement services in his shop, and failed to have evidence of a surety bond or liability insurance on the premises of his shop in violation of 19 NYCRR 160.9.
In the matter of the Application of Wayne Bell
276 DOS 99 - November 10, 1999 - (8.7KB PDF file) (2 pages)
The issue before the tribunal is whether the applicant should be denied registration as a barber apprentice because he was previously convicted of various crimes.
In the matter of the Application of Ronald Alvarez
355 DOS 99 - December 22, 1999 - (19.5KB PDF file) (5 pages)
The issue before the tribunal is whether the applicant should be denied a license as a barber because his criminal conviction, and the actions and circumstances underling that conviction, indicate a lack of good character and trustworthiness for licensure.
In the matter of the Application of Jessie Miller
212 DOS 00 - March 22, 2000 - (10KB PDF file) (2 pages)
The issue before the tribunal is whether the applicant should be denied a license to operate a barber shop because he was previously convicted of various crimes.
Department of State, Division of Licensing Services v. Jim Jackson
296 DOS 00 - April 25, 2000 - (14KB PDF file) (3 pages)
The complaint alleges that the respondent allowed an unlicensed person to act as a barber in his shop and failed to maintain that shop in a clean and sanitary manner.
